@T.M., I found a reference to thoughtforms in another book, “Bottoming Out the Universe: Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing” by Richard Grossinger. Here is a quote:
“Humanity’s noblest endeavor—not its crossbows and siege towers—up to the scientific
revolution was to decipher thoughtforms and nature in tandem and make provisional holy books and
keys. Once technocracy took over, the thoughtforms were not so much banished as put under their
own lockdown thoughtform, which stripped them of rights, power, and their true nature. The result
has been an outburst of violence, cruelty, and madness, because you can’t hide a whole universe in
a porcelain pitcher or a safe-deposit box. Of course, these same crimes and deliria took place in
earlier times, but on a smaller scale and under different rubrics of society and selfhood.
Enormous thoughtforms are gathering now like thunderclouds across our planet, crying out
for recognition: “We are creating this. Recognize us. Absolve us. Recognize yourselves.” As long as
we are mesmerized, we cannot act. We don’t realize that materiality with its wonders is both
inexhaustible and binding. Meanwhile the so-called “real” is burgeoning with crises of fixation,
from opiate addiction to hyperconsumption, from industrial pollution to nuclear proliferation to
mass shootings and executions, from human trafficking and sexual enslavement to savagery against
children and animals. These cannot be derailed by rules or good intentions or even remedial acts;
they can only be changed by the thoughtforms creating them.
The good news is, they are thoughtforms, so we can change them. If we change ourselves,
we change the universe. That’s a tall order, but it’s the only .”
Grossinger follows this with a quote from "Adventures in Consciousness" by Jane Roberts (She quotes Seth Two):
“After Seth Two speaks, it takes me a few minutes to
come back, while with Seth the transition is almost instantaneous.
But this time I returned easily, as if down a chute of consciousness.
Class was obviously excited and impressed, but when the students
told me what Seth Two had said, I had mixed feelings. This is
the part of the message that bothered me :
“Certain translations are being made for you so that these
communications make sense. Our energy forms worlds. We help
you maintain your lives, as you help maintain other existences of
which you have no conscious knowledge. We watch you as you
watch others, yet so vast is the distance that communication is
difficult.
We do not watch as human forms. You perceive us that way
in distorted view. In your terms our forms would be geometrical.
We do not understand the nature of the reality you are creating,
even though the seeds were given to you by us. We respect it and
revere it. Do not let the weak sounds of this voice confuse you.
The strength behind it would form the world as you know it and
sustain it for centuries.””
Topic: Are we thought forms? (Read 362 times)
