Useful Links• Seth Quotes Search Engine • Seth Research Project • The Seth House• Buy Seth Books • List of Seth Sessions, Indexes to Various Seth Books • List of Complete Writings of Jane/Seth books
Started by inavalan, April 12, 2023, 12:44:14 AM
Quote from: wadihicham on April 13, 2023, 03:50:41 PM...Regarding what you're saying about inverted time, that seems very interesting. It makes me think of the Mandela Effect. Maybe the past varies with the content of our memories.
Quote from: inavalan on April 15, 2023, 10:36:19 PM"The year 1980 exists in all of its potential versions, now in this moment. Because mass events are concerned there is not a completely different year, of course, for each individual on the face of the planet—but there are literally an endless number of mass-shared worlds of 1980 "in the wings," so to speak."—DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 891, December 26, 1979
Quote from: wadihicham on April 16, 2023, 01:26:39 PMQuote from: inavalan on April 15, 2023, 10:36:19 PM"The year 1980 exists in all of its potential versions, now in this moment. Because mass events are concerned there is not a completely different year, of course, for each individual on the face of the planet—but there are literally an endless number of mass-shared worlds of 1980 "in the wings," so to speak."—DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 891, December 26, 1979Yes, that's exactly the Mandela effect. For some people the past is such that Mandela died long ago in Prison while for a majority he died not so long ago and was the first black president of South Africa. No one is wrong, they just don't come from the same past !A point is not clear to me. I will formulate it as follows, hoping it will be clear:Does the person I was yesterday still exists, or is he now only part of a probable past that I construct from my present moment ?
QuoteBut beyond this life, and before this life, and forming this life, there are identities and there are realities and these are not dead. Identity as experience is intimate. It is a psychic reality but it exists electromagnetically. Identity, the self that you are, is made up of the selves that you were and, my dear friends, the selves that you shall be. The selves that you were still exist. The selves that you shall be already exist. The lives that you have lived, in your terms, are still being lived. There is no past, present or future. Time, as you know it, is a distortion brought about by the operation of the physical senses. Direct experience has no need of physical time. You exist now, period. The past, the present and the future as you know them are illusion, and yet they exist now. You can influence the past today; you can have memory of the future. You can draw upon the knowledge of the future today. You can change the past tomorrow. Your time is valid only within your system, and it is not particularly valid within your system. The dreams that you dream are as real as the classroom in which you sit. The dreams that you dream form your today.TES7 Seth's Lecture to Pat's Boston High School Class March 25, 1967
Quote"If you imagine yourself as a part of energy and a part of All That Is and an identity that forms and creates your body, then you know you create it with each breath that you take"—ECS4 ESP Class Session, June 15, 1971
Quote from: inavalan on April 16, 2023, 07:00:49 PMhe way I understand these, it isn't that people may not "come from the same past", as much as they create "different pasts" from the now.The present only apparently comes after the past; today only apparently comes after yesterday.
Quote from: wadihicham on April 17, 2023, 06:42:56 AMWe would need to decrypt the following lines ...
Quote from: wadihicham on April 21, 2023, 04:18:22 AMFor me, I need to understand what Seth is trying to teach us. Of course I know and accept that one cannot grasp it all by means of the intellect, our concepts reflect only camouflage patterns to begin with.When I said we need to decrypt , I meant we need to clarify by exchanging, particularly regarding our intuitive understandings. However, be careful: rejecting rationality too much, is at the risk of turning Seth's cosmology into some sort of religious text meant to be read piously without being questioned.
Quote from: inavalan on April 21, 2023, 01:22:32 PMWe may give some words different meanings, but we definitely look at Seth and at reality from quite different perspectives (as I assessed from the book you recently recommended; our further exchanges confirmed it).
Page created in 0.123 seconds with 23 queries.