Possible to tune in to the world view of any person, living, dead, not yet born

[inavalan]

"It is quite possible to tune in to the world view of any person, living or dead in your terms.  The world view of any individual, even not yet born from your standpoint, exists nevertheless."

I did this, both with persons I know, and historical figures. The former, out of curiosity and to better know them. The latter, attempting to learn about their way of thinking (e.g. Leonardo da Vinci). Some of those former experiences provided some verifiable insights, which made me wonder about the validity of the unverifiable information, from both categories.

[inavalan]

"Many quite modern and sophisticated developments have existed in what you think of now as past civilizations.  The plans, as models, were picked up by inventors, scientists, and the like, and altered to their own specific directions, so that they emerged in your world not as copies but as something new.  Many so-called archaeological discoveries were made when individuals suddenly tuned in to a world view of another person not of your space or time."

[inavalan]

"The same thing applies in more mundane endeavors in ordinary life.  For example: You may be in a predicament that seems beyond solving.  It may be highly individual, since it is yours.  It is unique, and has happened in no other way before.  No one else has viewed your particular dilemma through your eyes, yet others have been in similar situations, solved the challenges involved, and gone on to greater creativity and fulfillment.  If you can momentarily abandon your private world view, that focus from which you experience reality, then you can allow the experience of others who have had similar challenges to color your perception.  You can tune in to their solutions and apply them to your particular circumstances.  You often do this unconsciously.  "

[inavalan]

"Many people working with the Ouija board or automatic writing receive messages that seem, or purport, to come from historic personages.  Often, however, the material is vastly inferior to that which could have been produced by the person in question during his or her existence.  Any comparison with the material received to the written books or accounts already existing would immediately show glaring discrepancies.

Yet in many such instances, the Ouija board operator or automatic writer is to some extent or another tuning in to a world view, struggling to open roads of perception free enough to perceive an altered version of reality, but not equipped enough through training and temperament, perhaps, to express it.

The most legitimate instances of communication between the living and the dead occur in an intimate personal framework, in which a dead parent makes contact with its offspring: or a husband or wife freshly out of physical reality appears to his or her mate.  But very seldom do historic personages make contact, except with their own intimate circles.

There is great energy, however, in those who have persevered enough to become generally known in their time, and the great impetus of that psychic and mental energy does not cease at death, but continues.  In their way others may tune in to that continuing world view; and, picking it up, can be convinced that they are in contact with the physical personality who held it."

[inavalan]

With da Vinci I used "deep trance identification". With contemporaries I used regression / progression.

[Deb]

I'd love to tune into Elon Musk's world view, he's crazy creative. But I wonder if that would be a sort of invasion of privacy? I know Seth says we're always communicating telepathically and there are no secrets, but coming from my F1 mentality... I'd feel a little funny probing.