Let's free Lolita!

[strangerthings]

See her free!

Personally I feel all seaworlds are criminal but perhaps we can do something also.

Imagine it, feel it real!

Let us free her ! She deserves so much better than this!


https://rumble.com/v131h2b-52-years-in-a-bathtub.-the-internet-must-save-lolita-from-miami-seaquarium.html

[Bora137]

I'm in. She's ducking she's diving ranging across the deep. She is free. Putting some reality creation time into it now.

I think maybe it was Blackfish I watched years ago, an ex soldier was crying with regret at taking a baby orca, he was really messed up by it, he could sense these were higher beings🐬

[Bora137]

Hmm. I was just doing this now, that she is free then I got a sense does she want to be free? After 52 years I wondered how is she going to be in the wild? She will probably die pretty quick but is that better than dying in a tiny pool. Humans make such a mess.

[strangerthings]

Hmm. I was just doing this now, that she is free then I got a sense does she want to be free? After 52 years I wondered how is she going to be in the wild? She will probably die pretty quick but is that better than dying in a tiny pool. Humans make such a mess.

Id rather die free than as a slave!!!

They could at least put her in a huge sea water pool by ocean so she can swim and dive!

I say free her... all life deserves freedom

Whales never forget their family and I bet her family will come a callin!

[strangerthings]

Hmm. I was just doing this now, that she is free then I got a sense does she want to be free? After 52 years I wondered how is she going to be in the wild? She will probably die pretty quick but is that better than dying in a tiny pool. Humans make such a mess.

She was kidnapped at 4 taken from her family

Would you want freedom ?! To me its a no brainer

[Bora137]

Ye I would. Lifespan in captivity is max 45 and in wild up to 100, I've just read. Yep freedom it is 🐬🌅

[inavalan]

I interpret what I perceive through the filters of my beliefs, which lately are in much agreement with the Seth Material, and which are distinctively in opposition to what the overwhelming majority of people perceive, and to how they interpret it.

I love animals, and plants too. Surely, I have my favorites among them.

There are myriads of situations around us, of which Lolita's one. I believe that the best way to look at it is intuitively, as much as we are able. This situation is a symbol for us to interpret, both as a test and as a lesson. There isn't a single correct interpretation, as that depends on the individual needs and abilities of our personalities.

This applies to everything we experience: family, workplace, community, near and far situations we learn about, that affect us directly or not.

[inavalan]

This quote isn't directly related to Lolita's situation, but it is significant for people's attitude toward other forms of life.

"What does that mean? In practical terms it would mean that you would not wage war for the sake of peace. It would mean that you did not kill animals in experiments, taking their lives in order to protect the sacredness of human life. That would be a prime directive: "Thou shalt not kill even in the pursuit of your ideals" — for man has killed for the sake of his ideals as much as he has ever killed for greed, or lust, or even the pursuit of power on its own merits.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(10:53.) It means that you are not willing to take the actual steps in physical reality to achieve the ideal, but that you believe that the end justifies the means: "Certainly some lives may be lost along the way, but overall, mankind will benefit." That is the usual argument. The sacredness of life cannot be sacrificed for life's convenience, or the quality of life itself will suffer. In the same manner, say, the ideal is to protect human life, and in the pursuit of that ideal you give generations of various animals deadly diseases, and sacrifice their lives. Your justification may be that people have souls and animals do not, or that the quality of life is less in the animals, but regardless of those arguments this is fanaticism — and the quality of human life itself suffers as a result, for those who sacrifice any kind of life along the way lose some respect for all life, human life included. The ends do not justify the means (all very emphatically)."

—NoME Part Three: Chapter 7: Session 850, May 2, 1979