The basis of all existence is intuitional; intellect not necessary for life

Started by inavalan, July 28, 2022, 04:35:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

inavalan

July 28, 2022, 04:35:17 PM
Quote from: TES6 #257The basis of all life and of all existence can be loosely termed intuitional. Obviously the intellect is not necessary for life.

All existence is present , as you know. What you term past incarnations take place in the present. You simply invented a continual time system as a vehicle of perception for the ego, and it operates at that level only.
...

Now. I do not dream of Ruburt because I do not dream at all, in the same terms that you do. I switch the focus of my attention with conscious intent, so to speak. I take all portions of myself into any particular state of consciousness, and I enter various states of consciousness somewhat in the same manner that you can move from one physical country to another.

I visit you therefore, but I do not dream of you in the way that you might think. Now Ruburt has not, in his imagination, given me a particular physical image, and dreaming at your level involves visual images. So he does not dream of me in that way.

He does contact me however without his conscious knowledge in his dreams on some occasions. We simply speak to each other, but he does not remember what has been said consciously. Of course on other levels he is aware of these communications.

You have also communicated with me in this manner, Joseph, for your edification. You may if you wish suggest that you will remember some of these conversations, and then you may be able to do so, to some degree.
Like Like x 1 View List
Although I don't always write it explicitly, it should be inferred that everything I post is "my belief", "my opinion" on that subject, at that moment.

inavalan

#1
July 28, 2022, 05:09:29 PM
"Intellect is not necessary for life"? Intuition is the basis of existence?

Del (see video bellow) has a point, but he doesn't follow it all the way through ... It isn't intellect that marks the "chosen ones", but their intuition. They don't fall prey to misleading narratives, even if they don't consciously know why.

It is interesting how people of apparently above average intelligence fall prey to fear, hate, anger, and let themselves be controlled by their destructive emotions.





Like Like x 1 View List
Although I don't always write it explicitly, it should be inferred that everything I post is "my belief", "my opinion" on that subject, at that moment.

inavalan

#2
July 28, 2022, 05:12:03 PM
This sounds like an empirical argument for the above hypothesis:


Although I don't always write it explicitly, it should be inferred that everything I post is "my belief", "my opinion" on that subject, at that moment.

inavalan

#3
July 28, 2022, 09:09:32 PM
"Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." ----- Matthew 5:3

Maybe JC meant here the same thing, not putting down the intellect, but pointing that it isn't the criteria based on which man's evolvement is judged.

Some may believe that being "good" or such, is more important, but my interpretation is more in line with Seth's quote from the opening post: achieving a working level of intuition (some level of conscious use of his inner-senses) is the threshold that allows man to graduate, and not have to reincarnate (in other words "stay in heaven").
Although I don't always write it explicitly, it should be inferred that everything I post is "my belief", "my opinion" on that subject, at that moment.

inavalan

#4
July 28, 2022, 11:23:27 PM
This thread of posts is an example of something that often happens to me. I get an idea ... from something I read, a discussion, a movie, a thought, ... Then, in a short window of time, I get other inputs (from external sources, or just thoughts that pop into my mind) on that same idea, to better define and clarify it.

I just started to browse the following video, and their discussion (at ~10:35) came to the same intellect vs. intuition.

https://youtu.be/L6hFHr6-uJo?t=635




Although I don't always write it explicitly, it should be inferred that everything I post is "my belief", "my opinion" on that subject, at that moment.

strangerthings

#5
July 29, 2022, 08:03:34 PM
Or it is meant that they don't know their spirit IS the Kingdom of Heaven. They are blessed and do not realize it yet.

"Forgive them father for they know not what they do."

inavalan

#6
July 30, 2022, 04:51:28 PM Last Edit: July 30, 2022, 04:56:15 PM by inavalan
from: A SETH/JANE ROBERTS ANNOTATED BOOK LISTING, Compiled by Paul M. Helfrich, Ph.D.

The Magical Approach: Seth Speaks About the Art of Creative Living by Jane Roberts

"The Magical Approach" teaches us to live our lives spontaneously, creatively, and according to our own natural rhythms. It helps us to discover and tune into our natural, instinctive behavior. By applying the principles in this book, reader will learn to trust their impulses and discover the highest expression of their creativity. Seth discusses:

• assembly-line time vs. natural time
• the rational approach vs. the magical approach
• combining the rational (intellect) and magical (intuition)
• nature as a cooperative venture that serves as humanity's caretaker
• the natural person—following natural rhythms and using psychic abilities
• effortlessness—relaxation as creativity's greatest champion

Quote from: TMA"We are indeed dealing with two entirely different approaches to reality and to solving problems—methods we will here call the rational method and the magical one. The rational approach works quite well in certain situations, such as mass production of goods, or in certain kinds of scientific measurements—but all the rational method, as it is understood and used, does not work as an overall approach to life, or in the solving of problems that involve subjective rather than objective measurements or calculations. The magical approach has far greater weight, if you use it and allow yourselves to operate in that fashion, for it has the weight of your basic natural orientation." --- Seth
Although I don't always write it explicitly, it should be inferred that everything I post is "my belief", "my opinion" on that subject, at that moment.

inavalan

#7
July 31, 2022, 12:51:18 AM
(With some dry amusement:) Now: I myself have heard it said that all other species preserve nature, while man has a propensity for destroying it.

Sorry but you must log in to view spoiler contents.
Although I don't always write it explicitly, it should be inferred that everything I post is "my belief", "my opinion" on that subject, at that moment.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions