Rob's parents

[Mark M]

Your parents literally did not share the same reality at all. This is not as unusual as you may think. They met and related in a place BETWEEN each of their realities. It was not that they disagreed with each other's interpretation of events. The events WERE different.
In terms of energy, intent is stabilizing. There is a center to the self, again, that acts as a nucleus. The nucleus may change, but it will always be the center from which physical existence will radiate. Physically, intent or purpose forms that center, regardless of its reality in terms of energy.
In your family life in THIS reality, your parents acted opaquely to each other. There were strong energy shifts, so that the personalities did not meet directly. Some of this is difficult to explain. In a way they were unfocused, yet each with strong abilities but dispersed. There was a reason for this.
They contained within themselves intense and yet blurred talents that were used as energy sources by the children. They came together precisely to give birth to the family and for no other main reason as far as their joint reality was concerned. They seeded a generation, then.
Your mother loved physical reality and took the greatest pleasure in its most minute aspects, for all of her complaints. Your father loved it but never trusted it. Each of your parents had their strongest reality, this time and, in your terms, in a probable system of reality – and HERE (in this reality) they were offshoots. To them this system always seemed strange.

--Seth, The "Unknown" Reality, Volume 1 Sess. 680

[Deb]

Yep, that's a good quote. It stretches the imagination, and gives one reason why couples and families can have such different memories of events. I also found it a bit sad, but I suppose it makes sense that they came together for the one reason and accomplished their goal.

They did produce Rob and that alone was a major contribution for all of us.

[Mark M]

Deb wrote: "...families can have such different memories of events..."

"Because events do not exist in the concrete, done-and-finished versions about which you have been taught, then memory must also be a different story."

—NoME Part One: Chapter 2: Session 806, July 30, 1977

"Because you focus upon the similarities in experience, and play down the variances, then the oftentimes greater dissimilarities in so-called experience escape you completely. You take it for granted that memory is faulty if you do not agree with another person on the events that happened at a certain place and time — say those in a recently experienced historical past. You take it for granted that interpretations of events change, but that certain definite events occurred that are beyond alteration. Instead, the events themselves are not nearly that concrete. You accept one probable event. Someone else may experience instead a version of that event, which then becomes that individual's felt reality."

—UR2 Section 6: Session 729 January 13, 1975