Thanks to jbseth for drawing my attention to this chapter from “The God of Jane”:
https://speakingofseth.com/index.php?topic=1617.msg12301;topicseen#msg12301This little story gives us a good insight into the nature of Framework 2. “The woman from Big Flats” had read some of the Seth books and was keen to meet Jane, but she did not want to intrude by trying to discover Jane's phone number or address. Instead, her wish and desire to meet Jane was successful in “arranging” a meeting via Framework 2, perhaps telepathically. Here is the story in Seth's words:
“FROM SETH SESSION 864 JULY 2, 1979
“I want to discuss your meeting with the woman from
Big Flats, and Ruburt’s immediately prior knowledge of the event;
the nature of time in connection with Frameworks 1 and 2, and
mostly to emphasize the importance of beliefs.
“We will call the woman from Big Flats Mrs. X for
convenience’s sake. She has wanted to meet Ruburt for some time.
This intent was very strong and relatively steady. Mrs. X, however, is
not a pushy person. She would not intrude by trying to discover
your address or phone number. Her desire, however, was vivid: It
was clear, simple, direct. It was implanted, of course, in Framework
2, and it waited for its time of physical fulfillment. However, there
were obstacles. . . .”
“The woman’s desire had to wait for Ruburt’s change of
mind, then. Ruburt began precisely a month ago dealing with
impulses once again. This indeed created a new creative impetus,
and certain acts were set into motion. Whenever Mrs. X knows that
a new book of ours is out, her impulse is rekindled and intensified
in Framework 2; as if a bell were set ringing.
This time, Ruburt had
the impulse to go out in the middle of the working day, and the
woman’s desire helped kindle Ruburt’s own impulse; so that even
when he was tempted to stay home, he kept returning to that
impulse once again.”
Referring to the friend who visited us just before we
went to the supermarket, Seth said: “Your friend always has your
best interests at heart. He came in response to Framework 2
impulses, precisely so that the timing in Framework 1 could be
synchronized. Otherwise, of course, you would have been at the
proper location, but ahead of time.
“Ruburt was free enough of official dogma to become
consciously aware of the event as he sat in the car, before he actually
met Mrs. X. You (to Rob) were speaking to Mrs. X at the time, in the
store. Ruburt was almost consciously aware of the fact that there
was another reason for the trip downtown. He recognized the fact
that the impulse to go with you was unusually strong.
“Had he not believed in, say, telepathy, he never would
have been aware of his impression that someone was going to come
over to the car and recognize him—a stranger.
The woman [Mrs. X]
also believed that in one way or another it was at least possible that
her intent could somehow find fulfillment despite the obstacles.“Now your unfortunate scientist of the letter can have no
evidence of anything but official behavior, because he cannot allow
his consciousness that much freedom. It is not merely that he has
too much invested, but that the investment is in a closed system of
reality.
“Mrs. X’s clear intent in Framework 2 was to everyone’s
benefit. However, for some time it was blocked because the other
person involved made certain decisions that made the meeting
unlikely. The moment Ruburt changed, the way was clear and the
action took place almost immediately. The scientist, however, has
placed so many impediments for himself in Framework 1 that he
cannot open the door for the impulses that would lead him toward
the kind of evidence he thinks he wants.
“
Framework 2 is a multidimensional medium of creativity and value fulfillment, in
which desires from the most simple to the most complex become
actualized events—if those desires are for your own good and for
the good of others; not, for example, to be actualized at someone
else’s expense, and if you, yourselves, do not place impediments in
Framework 1.. . .”
Recent Posts